Importance of managing organizational politics risks

Importance of managing organizational politics risks: sometimes outside of awareness but still need our attention.

Extract from Chaco Canyon Consulting “Point Lookout” – Rick Brenner:

When we manage risk, we usually focus on those risks most closely associated with the tasks at hand – content risks. But there are other risks, to which we pay less attention. Many of these are outside our awareness. Here’s Part II of an exploration of these non-content risks, emphasizing those that relate to organizational politics.

In Part I (see “Managing Non-Content Risks: Part I,” Point Lookout for October 31, 2012) of this exploration of risks not directly related to task content, we focused on those risks that are associated with perceptions. Here are three additional risk classes that relate more closely to organizational politics.

Errors internal, organizational, and contextual

Internal errors are those that happen within the task, including, for example, premature disclosure of information, misstatements, and faulty estimates. External errors are those that happen within the hosting organization, such as server crashes, or terminations of key personnel. Contextual errors involve elements outside the hosting organization, such as vehicle collisions, fires, floods, or war.

Relying on organizational processes for protection from all errors is risky. Understand the limits of the protections the organization provides. To the extent possible, provide your own coverage for remaining gaps.

Resource protection

Although we usually associate securing resources with task initiation, maintaining access to resources is always important. And we’re often surprised when we lose access to resources, even though most tasks experience resource interruptions at some point in their lives.

Diligence and a strong personal network are vital in maintaining situational awareness with respect to resource predation. Create plans not only for adapting when resources are withdrawn, but also for defending the resources and commitments you already have.

Bureaucratic inertia

Organizations tend to continue doing whatever they’ve been doing, which in many cases, isn’t much. One-of-a-kind or first-of-a-kind tasks are therefore likely to encounter difficulties, because of the inherent contrast between them and other work.

These difficulties are more pronounced when the initiative originates somewhere other than the top of the organization.  Advocates of such efforts can be effective when they have warm personal relationships with those who serve in gating functions that can impede progress.

Political sabotage

Political sabotage includes any effort to disrupt, delay, or terminate the task in order to free its resources for other efforts, or to besmirch the careers of the task’s advocates.

Tactics of political saboteurs can include spreading disinformation, reassigning key personnel, and manipulating resource streams.

When political sabotage occurs, it’s rarely a surprise. Plan for it. Include in statements of the task vision refutations of arguments saboteurs are likely to make someday. These arguments are far more effective when offered in advance of the sabotage attempts than they are when offered as defense after the fact.

Most important, recognize that the political efforts required to maintain the health and vitality of tasks or projects do take time and resources. Include in budgets and schedules enough time and coverage for those who must execute the political maneuvers that keep the task on track. Political success isn’t free.

More … http://www.chacocanyon.com/pointlookout/121107.shtml